INCEPT 2.0 Reference List

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2014. Age Standard 1.7. Retrieved from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/1200.0.55.006main+features62014,%20Version%201.7


Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2016 Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS): Volume 3 – Non ABS structures. Retrieved from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/1270.0.55.003~July%202016~Main%20Features~Postal%20Areas%20(POA)~8


Australian Evaluation Society (AES), 2013. Guidelines for the ethical conduct of Evaluations. Retrieved from: https://www.aes.asn.au/images/stories/files/membership/AES_Guidelines_web_v2.pdf


Brown A, 2016. Differences between Theory of Change and the Logic Model. Retrieved from: https://www.annmurraybrown.com/single-post/2016/03/20/Theory-of-Change-vsThe-Logic-Model-Never-Be-Confused-Again


Center for the Advancement of Collaborative Strategies in Health (CACSH), 2002. Partnership self-assessment tool questionnaire. Retrieved from: https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10214/3129/Partnership_Self-Assessment_Tool-Questionnaire_complete.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y


Coffey, 2018. What is a Theory of Action? Retrieved from: http://www.coffey.com/en/ingenuity-coffey/what-is-a-theory-of-action/


Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Ethics Committee, 2018. Project Specific Guidelines. Retrieved from: https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/about/clinical-trials-and-research/human-research-ethics-committee/project-specific-guidelines


Ellsberg M and Potts A, 2018. Ethical considerations for research and evaluation on ending violence against women and girls. Retrieved from: https://dfat.gov.au/aid/how-we-measure-performance/ode/strategic-evaluations/Documents/ode-evawg-ethical-considerations-for-research-and-eval.pdf


Funnel S & Rogers P (2011). Purposeful Program Theory. Effective Use of the Theories of Change and Logic Models, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco CA


Health Nexus, 2018. Partnership Essentials. Retrieved from:  http://en.healthnexus.ca/topics-tools/community-engagement/partnerships


Kania J & Kramer M, 2011. Collective Impact. Stanford Social review. Retrieved from: http://ssir.org/articles/entry/collective_impact


Stevahn L & King J.A., 2016. Facilitating interactive evaluation practice: Engaging stakeholders constructively. In R.S Fierro, A. Schwartz & D.H. Smart (Eds), Evaluation and Facilitation. New Directions for Evaluation, 149, 67 – 80. Retreived from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ev.20180


Morris A, Hegarty K & Humphreys C, 2012. Ethical and safe: Research with children about domestic violence. Research Ethics, 8(2) 125 – 139. Retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1747016112445420


NHMRC, 2007. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research, 2007 (updated 2018). Retrieved from: https://nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/national-statement-ethical-conduct-human-research-2007-updated-2018#block-views-block-file-attachments-content-block-1


Noone, J. H., Marjolin, A., Skelton, L., Graham, K., Salignac, F., Powell, A. (2017). Collaboration Health Assessment Tool. Sydney: Centre for Social Impact. Retrieved from: http://www.csi.edu.au/chat/about/


Our Watch 2015. Change the Story: a shared framework for the primary prevention of violence against women and their children. Retrieved from: https://www.ourwatch.org.au/what-we-do/national-primary-prevention-framework


Our Watch, 2016. Community based prevention of violence against women and their children. A toolkit for practitioners. Retrieved from: https://www.ourwatch.org.au/getmedia/0ae20458-abd0-4df6-81a9-4626c98dee25/OurWatch-Community-Toolkit-2-AA.pdf.aspx


Our Watch, 2017, Counting On Change. A Guide to Prevention Monitoring. Retrieved from: https://www.ourwatch.org.au/What-We-Do/Counting-on-change-A-guide-to-prevention-monitorin


Our Watch, 2018. Changing the picture: A national resource to support the prevention of violence against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and their children. Retrieved from: https://www.ourwatch.org.au/getmedia/ab55d7a6-8c07-45ac-a80f-dbb9e593cbf6/Changing-the-picture-AA-3.pdf.aspx


Owen J, 2006. Program Evaluation: forms and approaches. Crows Nest, NSW, Allen & Unwin.


The Lowitja Institute, 2011. Ethics Hub. Available at: https://www.lowitja.org.au/ethics


Minkler M & Wallerstein N, 2008. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. From process to outcomes, 2nd Edn. Chapter 12: Issues in participatory evaluation, p199; Springett J & Wallerstein N . Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292125087_Issues_in_participatory_evaluation


The Ohio Primary Prevention of Intimate Partner Violence & Sexual Violence Empowerment Evaluation Toolkit, 2011. Amy Bush Stevens, Sandra Ortega, Ohio Domestic Violence Network, Columbus, Ohio. Retrieved from: http://www.odvn.org/prevention/empowerment-toolkit.html


Vic Health, 2011. The Partnerships Analysis Toolhttps://www.vichealth.vic.gov.au/media-and-resources/publications/the-partnerships-analysis-tool


Vic Health, 2015. Evaluating Victorian projects for the primary prevention of violence against women: A concise guide. Retrieved from: https://www.vichealth.vic.gov.au/media-and-resources/publications/a-concise-guide-to-evaluating-primary-prevention-projects


Webster, K., Diemer, K., Honey, N., Mannix, S., Mickle, J., Morgan, J., Parkes, A., Politoff, V., Powell, A., Stubbs, J., & Ward, A. (2018). Australians’ attitudes to violence against women and gender equality. Findings from the 2017 National Community Attitudes towards Violence against Women Survey (NCAS) (Research report, 03/2018). Sydney, NSW: ANROWS. Retrieved from: https://www.anrows.org.au/research-program/ncas/


W.K. Kellogg Foundation, 2017. The Step-by-Step Guide to Evaluation. How to become Savvy Evaluation Consumers. Retrieved from: http://evaluationguide.wkkf.org/


World Health Organisation (WHO) 2001. Putting women first: Ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence against women. Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/gender-equity-rights/knowledge/who_fch_gwh_01.1/en/